Despite delivering quarterly results and a full-year profit forecast that exceeded Wall Street's projections, HP Inc saw its shares plunge roughly 10% in after-hours trading on Wednesday. The selloff reflects investor apprehension about underlying demand weaknesses that overshadow the seemingly positive headline numbers.
On August 26, after the U.S. market closed, HP Inc reported its fiscal third-quarter earnings for the period ending July 31. Total revenue grew approximately 13% year-over-year to $15.7 billion. Adjusted earnings per share, which exclude items like restructuring costs, came in at $0.83, a figure that includes a $0.11 per share benefit from tariff refunds.
Looking ahead, the company guided for fiscal fourth-quarter adjusted EPS in the range of $0.69 to $0.79, comfortably above the average analyst estimate of $0.67. However, investors were not swayed by the headline beat. The crux of the concern lies in the "quality" of that profit guidance. The Q4 forecast incorporates a $0.08 per share contribution from tariff refunds. Stripping that out, the midpoint of the guidance drops to roughly $0.66, which is about a penny below what the market had anticipated.
In other words, a significant portion of the apparent earnings upgrade is driven by one-off or non-operational factors, rather than an improvement in core business fundamentals. Adding to the unease is the outlook for PC and printer demand. While HP Inc's PC segment revenue grew 18% in the third quarter, unit shipments actually declined by 16%, indicating that top-line growth was largely fueled by price increases. Sharply higher memory chip costs have forced HP Inc to raise prices on some PC models and redesign products, a dynamic that could further dampen end-user demand.
Double-Digit Revenue Growth, But Profits Flattered by Tariff Refunds
For the fiscal third quarter, HP Inc posted total sales of $15.7 billion, up roughly 13% year-over-year. Given the generally soft demand environment across the PC hardware industry, this growth rate looks respectable on the surface. On the earnings side, the company reported adjusted EPS of $0.83. It is important to note this includes a $0.11 per share benefit from tariff refunds in the quarter. Excluding that gain, the underlying earnings performance would have been noticeably weaker.
Management's outlook for the fiscal fourth quarter calls for adjusted EPS between $0.69 and $0.79, versus the market consensus of $0.67. On the face of it, the provided range is above expectations. However, this forecast also includes a $0.08 per share contribution from tariff refunds. Without that impact, the adjusted EPS range for Q4 equates to $0.61 to $0.71, with a midpoint of approximately $0.66—slightly below what analysts were modeling. For the full fiscal year, HP Inc projects adjusted EPS of $3.19 to $3.29, ahead of the $3.05 consensus. Yet again, this annual guidance also contains tariff refund benefits.
For investors, the fundamental question isn't whether the numbers are higher, but whether that elevation is sustainable.
PC Revenue Jumps 18%, But Shipments Slide 16%
The PC segment was the most closely watched part of HP Inc's quarterly report. In Q3, the Personal Systems division generated revenue of $11.8 billion, an 18% increase year-over-year, bolstered by a 22% jump in commercial unit sales. However, the more telling metric was on the volume side: PC shipments fell by 16%. This suggests the revenue growth was not a product of expanding demand, but rather a result of higher prices and a shift in product mix.
HP Inc is grappling with substantially higher memory chip costs, prompting the company to increase prices on several PC lines and redesign certain products. In the short term, price hikes can support revenue and margins. But over the medium to long term, end consumers and corporate clients may postpone purchases due to "sticker shock," which would further weigh on shipment volumes. The printing business, meanwhile, turned in a lackluster performance. Q3 printing revenue came in at $3.9 billion, down 2% year-over-year, roughly matching expectations. Unlike the PC division, printing did not exhibit any noticeable price-driven growth and failed to be a bright spot for the quarter. For HP Inc, printers and supplies have long been a crucial profit engine, but the segment continues to face soft demand and structural pressures.
Why the Stock Fell: Market Had Already Priced In 'Better Than Feared'
HP Inc shares dropped approximately 10% in after-hours trading following the earnings release, after closing the regular session at $30.52. Prior to this report, the stock had already gained 37% year-to-date. This implies the market had partially baked in expectations for a "better than feared" July quarter. Analysts had noted before the print that investors were already anticipating HP Inc to beat low expectations, shifting the focus to whether PC and printer market trends were deteriorating. The current earnings report, while offering higher profit forecasts, does little to alleviate concerns about next year's demand, cost pressures, and pricing elasticity.
Core Contradiction: Improved Profit Guidance vs. Questionable Demand Quality
The key takeaway from HP Inc's results isn't whether growth occurred, but the quality of that growth. On one hand, the company delivered double-digit revenue growth, a significant boost in PC revenue, and full-year earnings guidance above consensus. On the other, PC shipments declined sharply, profits were flattered by tariff refunds, and the printing segment remains sluggish. For a hardware company, price increases can improve revenue and profit in the near term. However, if unit sales continue to decline, the market will worry that higher prices are borrowing against future demand. This is precisely the dilemma HP Inc faces: cost pressures push prices up, which in turn may suppress demand. Until the company provides guidance for the next fiscal year, investors will be watching three key areas: whether PC shipments can stabilize, if memory cost pressures ease, and whether core profitability can hold up once the tariff refunds fade away.